If I bought a house, could I put it in my daughter's name (age 13?)

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by bfchris, Jul 3, 2008.

  1. bfc

    bfchris Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    Messages:
    958
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Barnsley, United Kingdom
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Also any idea on how much it would cost to do up? E.g how much to totally replaster a 2 up 2 down terrace? Thanks</p>

    Foz
    </p>
     
  2. Our

    Our Jud New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Bookies, Looking for Ar Billy
    On a mortgage basis no, as minors are unable to enter into a legally binding contract.
     
  3. *Windy

    *Windy Banned Idiot

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Messages:
    8,416
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    You could if you paid outright for it but....

    </p>

    .....I think you might beliable for capital transfer tax (or it's current manifestation.) </p>

    The last time I had a house fully plastered it cost about &pound;1,200. </p>
     
  4. bfc

    bfchris Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    Messages:
    958
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Barnsley, United Kingdom
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    What would that tax entail? If it was secured against our house, isn't there something that says that e don't have to pay tax on any income from it if it is rented out? Does this not apply to the buying of it as well? thanks
     
  5. Our

    Our Jud New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Bookies, Looking for Ar Billy
    That tax on it's own i'd not be too sure. Any rental inome that you receive will be taxed according to your tax status (IE basic/higher rate) if it's solely providing income, but if it were secured against your house then i'm fairly sure that there'd be no tax implications if you were simply using the income to pay yur mortgage on the property off. But you'd be able to claim a wear and tear allowance..
    You'd basically want a decent accountant...

    Tax isn't my forte, but chuck owt else financial services at me by all means!!
     
  6. *Windy

    *Windy Banned Idiot

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Messages:
    8,416
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    The tax is (or was) on the transfer of ownership of a large asset. nt
     
  7. *Windy

    *Windy Banned Idiot

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Messages:
    8,416
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    Think I might have misunderstood your question.

    Edit. Try again.</p>

    You're securing the loan against your house so you own the new property outright and can do what you like with it but if you give it away (to your daughter) I still think they'll hit you with some sort of capital transfer tax. If you intend to let the property you're supposed to pay tax on the income and I don't think putting it in your daughter's name will get round that.</p>
     
  8. bfc

    bfchris Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    Messages:
    958
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Barnsley, United Kingdom
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Thanks for your time, it's amazing the level of experience and depth of knowledge on this board! I've yet to ask a question that someone hasn't been able to answer! Cheers. I think a solicitor or financial adviser is the next step eh? Foz
     

Share This Page