What you basing that on, pre-season? I haven't made any warm up games, but I've read nothing said on here that would lead me to believe coulson is ready to start his first football league match. Positives yes, but not there yet...?
I havent seen any pre season games either but i think hes the best striker weve got and he should play every week
RE: but you've never seen him play and you've deduced he's our best striker If consistency was a ratio, Richards would be 1/32, very poor consistency ratio Hayes is better on the wing than upfront, so hes not a striker Leicester (a championship club) sold Wright to us for a rip off 10p, so that means hes not good enough for the championship. Same with Heckingbottom, hes not good enough for the champoionship otherwise Sheff Wed wouldnt have sold him. Coulson is our 2nd best striker becasue i forgot about Nardiello, if you run like a chicken and still manage to score goals, your an absolute genious Therefore Coulson should be playing every week
RE: but you've never seen him play and you've deduced he's our best striker Are you Adam Hinchcliffe in disguise or simply after his mantle?
RE: but you've never seen him play and you've deduced he's our best striker when was heckingbottom a striker??? bit harsh bringing him into the equation seeing as he's not a striker ff
RE: but you've never seen him play and you've deduced he's our best striker Not seen Coulson play yet, but Im basing the fact he wont start a game from what Ritchie as said in interviews..... I.E. One for the future. I agree, based on reports I would have him starting along with Hayes. If he is good enough then he is old enough
Scarborough let us have Coulson Who presumably by your logic is therefore not good enough for the Conference.
RE: Scarborough let us have Coulson If we base things on he can't be any good or they wouldn't have let him go there wouldn't be a transfer market.