They decide that a jury can't give a proper judgement in the case of a bloke who -has a history of sexual violence and killing -said his dead brother-in-law did it -there is DNA evidence of sexual contact with two girls who were found dead The reason being they can't find DNA evidence that he bound them, or a witness to him abducting them. Yet he had sex with them ... and he knows his brother-in-law killed them. Talk about getting off on a technicality http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/6986995.stm
Yes but he's a "model prisoner" in charge of the prison kitchens, comes across as pleasant and polite when interviewed ... but clearly a nutter when psychoanalysed The sort of bloke that will probably manage to convince them that he's reformed ... and then end up back inside
