but which of the Ritchie Jones critics on here deciding he's not a good signing have actually seen him play?
It just stuns me. They've seen Ray Parlour play (though they haven't seen him play ALL SEASON since he's barely kicked a ball), but expect an older player to suddenly gain match sharpness and be an excellent acquisition. Ritchie Jones - highly rated by Man Utd, and by Colchester, a young lad with something to prove. For Ray Parlour, see Colin Healy. I was always brought up that you don't judge someone/something until you know them. Good luck Ritchie - but unless you score a debut hat-trick and don't misplace a pass, you will not be appreciated.
They're all cnuts, it's as simple as that. They'd have reputation over promise any day. Parlous is a has been, I can't see him doing much at Hull.
I assume you think he is a good signing, Playing Devils Advocate i'll ask when have you seen him play , in order to convince yourself he will be a good signing.</p> I</p>
I don't think he's a good signing - yet. But I can't believe the amount of people on these boards that criticise a lad before they've seen him play. I do think he's more likely to be a success than someone like Parlour, who hasn't played all season.
Only seen this kid once on the Telly, I hope he is **** hot as our midfield has forgotten how to create anything.
They just moan whatever the outcome.</p> </p> If we had signed Parlour they'll be moaning because he's old and hasnt played all season.</p>
