just listened to P & G from last night

No fan of Giddings or them, but thought in the context that it's a programme for everyone then he did a fair job.

 

I also thought that, not sure why one poster said it was bias. I thought reds fans were given a fair crack at it. Giddings said a few times "it doesnt look good" re the incident. Butt fell short of agreeing it was deliberate. They have to be very careful what they say on such issues.

 

only 1 person know's if it was deliberate. CHRIS MORGAN

 

Me too

Plenty of air time for the Davey interview. Lots of air time for the sensible Barnsley callers. Cut the numpties off short.

 

Just listening now, think Giddings does a decent job. A lot better than fat Seth, can't stand that Barsteward

 

He denied intent all the way through...

</p>

...and cut one caller off who'd claimed it was premeditated by saying, &quot;It wasn't premeditated at all.&quot; Of course it was, he just didn''t want it to be. It was about him imposing his view rather than listening to those of the callers. It's supposed to be a phone in show for people to express their views not to be told what to think by a biased ****** like him.</p>

So **** off.</p>

 

I think we all know it was deliberate.

</p>

Unless he suffers from alien arm syndrome. <font size="7">PWAAY!</font></p>

</p>

 

Trouble is i suspect that is the radio sheffield company line, they wont want to piss SUFC and Giddings will just be playing the mediator. He cant go either way on this subject

 

Link please nt

 

I'd rather sit listen to Dizzy Rascal rap his way through Margaret Thatchers Memoirs

than that blatantly biased ****.

 

RE: He denied intent all the way through...

They leave themselves open to all sorts of legal action if they allow folk to make claims like that.
</p>

So **** and piss off.
</p>

 

imwithee nt

 

So he wasn't fair then.....

</p>

....he just had a good reason for not telling the truth.</p>

So ****, piss and knob off.</p>

 

Giddings

amateur lovely person.

BTW how accurate is an eye test likely to be when performed on a 4 1/2 y.o.

 

RE: Giddings

Depends on the bairn and patience of the optom.</p>

But if the bairn's creating there are ways to attain an accurate result.
</p>

 

RE: Giddings

</p>

Duct tape?</p>

 

behaved pretty well to be honest but referred him to see an Ophthalmologist??? Maybe because I had a "lazy" eye when I was his age. Now I've got the rest of the body to go with it.

prescription was abart +1.25, +0.5 IIRC

 

RE: Giddings

That and a cattle prod.

 

Most kids are slightly long sighted to a certain degree. It's if it makes a difference to their vision.</p>

If there's a family history of eye problems such as a lazy eye and in the consultation the optom can't get the childs vision up then a referral is what happens. Without knowing the visual acuities it's difficult to judge - but these days a 'safety first' route is the one to choose. Early detection of any problem is the key - it can get sorted and even if specs have to be worn, then at least the vision can be brought up to a good level.
</p>

</p>

 

RE: So he wasn't fair then.....

Facking racist swine.