Gotta be close to the sack surely??? He constantly refers to our players of being low value which while true must make them feel proper useless that their own manager talks down about them. He's finally the chance to bring in someone with experience of premiership/championship football on loan and decides an inexperience kid with one goal and a relegation to his name is the answer. He won't drop his blue eyed boy Wiseman no matter how bad he plays. You'd think Scott has some dirt on Keef to bribe him to keeping his place in the team. Alnwick was dropped after mistakes, Mcnulty was dropped today after mistakes, yet the consistancy there will never stretch to Wiseman. Another game where we never looked like scoring. Even if we stay up that will be another 500-1000 season ticket holders gone for next season as people won't spend money watching a team with no ambition.
FFS get of wisemans back just cos he has not got ginger hair, he had a good game and has been ok for us his percentage ****up is considerably less than Hassells
Seems to be a continuous theme here. 99% think wiseman should be dropped only 1 doesn't. Wonder why that is?
They both dislike Sir Bobby and love Wiseman. To be fair to Wiseman I think he's a better centre half than he is a full back and he's not as bad as some make out. The tactics don't help our centre halves.
Three times today Wiseman took an extra touch with head or foot, usually in the wrong direction, putting himself and the team under extra pressure. A better away team would have punished him for that today. And while I'm on, why do our players pass the ball out wide either backwards or level with the player on the flank? Why do they not 'arc' the ball so that the flank player can run on to it? And why do some of our players appear so woefully one-footed? Is that really acceptable in a Championship standard player? Yet more evidence that Hill has assembled a squad that is not for purpose.