Keith Hill criticising the fans negativity

I think he's seriously mis-read this one.

For a start, money comes hard in the main around these parts, and when supporters shell out to watch the Reds they exepct :

1. The team to be competitive at home, even if we lose, not played off the park.
2. The team to keep going right to the end. No battling Barnsley last night, gave up halfway through the second half.
3. Not to concede 3 goals in the first half through schoolboy defending.
4. To have at least one or two shots on target.
5. Players to be played in their best positions.
6. Not to see 1 up front at home, when it clearly didn't work 3 days ago.
7. Some honesty from the manager in his after match comments.

and remember Keith, it was you who promised good football, and you who said clean sheets are king. We were really lucky only to concede 4 in the last two games, it could have been double figures.

That's why the fans booed, not because we lost. If KH thinks that was an acceptable performance, then it's going to be a short and unhappy marriage.

 

can't believe he has the nerve to call us negative with what we've watched on the pitch for 3 games straight. if that's not negative i don't know what is!

 

His comments were bang out of order and he needs to be told so. If he thinks last night was acceptable and we're all wrong then he won't be around for long because the boos are going to get longer and louder the longer this unacceptable **** continues. I just couldn't believe that we played the same **** formation and tactics that failed so miserably against Soton.