i keep reading that Hill wasnt happy with the fee but he didnt say that on is player intetview or i didnt hear him say that either on Radio Sheffield yet people on here keep saying keiths not happy, keiths not happy. in the interviews ive heard over that last 5 days he was very annoyed that rvt had left but thats becausr he felt they had unfinshed bussiness. he wantef him here until may. Now he also said they didnt miss him on tuesday night and wasnt that fussed about bringing in a loan but would have liked to get a replacement in permo.
He was asked directly on Radio Sheffield. He answered directly, (that he wasn't happy). My take on it is that we got a reasonable fee, (£700k ish) but he's not got all the money to spend. Could be wrong, cos I'm guessing on the fee.
But he should think medium term. dont send anything now and we could get tonge, in summer maybe or at least a bigger budget. he no's its coming. he said it before derby. the fair play rule will help him in the summer. we actually look quite good. nobodys injured apart from mcevley. weve not bern in this poition all season. 6 points and where safe imo.
But he should think medium term. dont spend anything now and we could get tonge, in summer maybe or at least a bigger budget. he no's its coming. he said it before derby. the fair play rule will help him in the summer. we actually look quite good. nobodys injured apart from mcevley. weve not bern in this poition all season. 6 points and where safe imo.
I may be wrong but if i was you i would have a look at your keys on your pc as i believe someone may have moved some of the letters around whilst you wasn't looking.
Re: £300k for Vaz - no wonder Keith Hill was f*cked off I'd be very surprised if we accepted £300k for him. I reckon it was at least double that.
Re: £300k for Vaz - no wonder Keith Hill was f*cked off You know that for a fact do you? Or perhaps that is the amount Keith will have to spend out of the Vaz Te fee.
Re: £300k for Vaz - no wonder Keith Hill was f*cked off I thought the Don had said that the money they got for Vaz Te would go back into the transfer kitty? I didn't think he'd said some of the money but I'm not certain.
Hemsworth - I know there is no chance you will reply to this as it implies you might not be correct but have you listened to Keith Hills post match interview on player the one called "Keith Hill Post Derby Reaction 3 minutes 45 seconds onwards Q Are you happy with what you got for him A No Definitely not ..... now i might be wrong but you said "i keep reading that Hill wasnt happy with the fee but he didnt say that on is player intetview" does that mean we can expect you will agree in this case you are not correct?
ive listened to that intetview 3 times now and i dont get he was on about the fee in the player interview. i got that he wasnt happy with rvt himself.
He did go onto say about other players close to being out of contract going for large fee's and as Farnham stated, the emphasis was on how much we got for him. It was very obvious to me that he was disappointed with the fee, and also with the player.
I've stuck up for thi in past owd lad, but you're just mental wi' this one. 'are you happy with the fee' 'no, not at all considering the money floating around for players out of contract in the Summer' It can't mean owt but.
Re: £300k for Vaz - no wonder Keith Hill was f*cked off No, he said the money would go into the kitty......they are going to buy some cat food with it!
