kennedy = wiseman= moses= liddle= kenny brown= nicky eaden = etc

You forget Dawson.

 

Apparently Kennedy and Wiseman played well today. That will not suit some.

 

To be fair, a poor Nicky Eaden display would still be much better than a Tom Kennedy MOTM performance. Different quality, both offensively and defensively. And that's not a dig at TK. That's just me showing my love for the most underrated BFC laiker in my lifetime.


But I do get your point. And at times like this I think the manager ought to be looking at taking said player out of the spotlight for a while. Continually selecting them rarely proves to be a good idea. Look at Wisey last season.


Let's rest TK, and give Bobby a run in defence. Our best defender. (swim, you little fishies)

 

To be fair he did pull him out but had to reinstate him for a late injury didn`t he, was that at Leicester?

 

Have you read all the reports from people that went Mario ? Some say Kennedy was rubbish, but that will not suit some others eh ?

 

True.

I think he'll loan someone during the break.

If not, perhaps Nyatanga could play there? Or maybe we'll go 3-5-2 again? Boro do play 3 in the middle of the park, so could be the plan.

 

I did read them mate and while I'm not saying this is the case today there are some on here who won't give him any credit no matter what. I thought he deserved to be dropped after the Watford game but aside from that game he's been no worse than any of our other defenders IMO. I genuinely think he is just a scapegoat for some in the same way Scott was last season. He's has some good games, some bad games and a shocker or two but so have all our players. He's certainly not as bad as some make him out to be.

 

I think he realises Kennedy needs resting, lets hope his hunt comes up with something better.

 

heel snapping again xxxx

 

I thought I got it at first, you were listing players to whom the fans have given some stick, but then you mentioned Moses who I can't remember getting any at all. If Liddell got any it was extremely limited and over a very short period. Eaden got some, but only by real mongs, the majority could see what an asset he was. I also thought you were doing it in reverse chronological order, but then Keith Brown jumped from the 70s to the 90s. Either that or you remember a different Nicky Eaden from some time in the 60s.

If that is the point of your post then I tend to agree, but you've used some odd examples.

 

Did you go , nope, just how many games do YOU attend at Oakwell, You know I dont and I have said it over and over again, but you very rarely attend and keep having a pop at others!!

 

The number of games you attend has no bearing on the fact you're a lovely person.

 

You asked a question. I answered it.