KP - You ********

wot happened m8 missed it

 

He hit 2 fours then a 6 in 3 balls

Then next ball he skied it straight up going for a 6 to get his century

 

same old pieterson tryin for 6 for is 100

 

dickheads

have the following 86-0-453-3
cmon terry , who is the ******** ?

 

thats kp's game

cant change him, makes him the batsman he is, and he is one of the worlds best, and certainly better than anyone else in the england team, we are lucky to have him

 

i agree

good job he doe's not play for barnsley eh , this set of prat's (read above) would force him onto the bench

 

hold on where have i said somet wrong about pieterson i only said goin 4 6 for is 100 cos thats his usual case no doubt hes best batter we have

 

LOL

Cmon - When did you play at Pudsey and which one?

 

Can't Believe I Agree With mrx

KP is the last ******** in the England team. If it wasn't for him we would be in the ****. It's people like Bell and Strauss who have let us down.

 

And I am not doubting his class

The problem I have and the majority of people who know anything about cricket would say that having got us into a position where we can look towards 350+ he throws it away (again) putting us under massive pressure.</p>

There was no need for him to do it and to be honest it was on the cards.</p>

Listen to what the pundits are saying... </p>

 

I agree with Botham.

Look at how pathetic our score would be without him. If we tell him to nudge and nurdle in his innings, he'll probably fall into the same rut as the rest of them, score 22 from 90 balls, and then get trapped lbw because he's become too negative.

Its a silly, silly dismissal, but its going to happen sometimes with batsmen like him. He knows he's done wrong, but I think when a man batting at number 4 comes in with 97 out of a score of 180-5, you just have to say well played to him and then thank the Lord that he's not injured, because if he was, we'd probably be 105 all out.

 

you know something about cricket ?



88-0-576-2

bet the glaziers in elsecar love it when you come on to bowl !!
and i do not mean the manchester glaziers.

 

PUDSEY? PUDSEY WHO? nt

 

ask ernie

we both played at a higher standard than you

5-0-67-0

smashing figures eh terry ?

best thing is the 0,7,4,3,0, did not make up for the bowling

and you make comment about peterson .................... :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( (kissmyass) (kissmyass)

 

I've played at a higher level than Ernie you clown...

And I'm asking you not Ernie...</p>

Come on... Which Pudsey?</p>

 

Like watching Glen Yates nt

 

RE: And I am not doubting his class

i do see your point mate i do. but 97 aint a bad innings is it? stauss and cook have let us down really, put the rest of the team under massive pressure

 

You get out early doors, there's not a lot you can do. (Although, Cook's shot was shameful), but to chuck your wicket away when well set is criminal.

 

terry/andrew , you are confusing 'played at'

with the phrase 'effective at '

9-0-77-0
3 r.o

i will let you follow on , i love a 3 day win , you should pray for snow !