We're after a laptop for home, with about 500 quid to spend. We need to be able to... - Photo processing incl. Photoshop, and to store lots of images (thousands) - Store extensive music library (thousands of songs) - Use stats programs such as SPSS - And all yer standard stuff, email, wireless internet, word processing etc. ...without slowing down or throwing a wobbler. I know next to nothing about PCs (I'm a Mac user at work but wifey needs a PC) so don't know if a 500 quid laptop can do this no probs or if we need to spend a bit more. Anyone got any recommendations/steer clears?
Fork out slighlty more and get an entry level Sony Vaio - failing that, the Toshiba Sat 153 is a good buy. The laptop should handle mosth things, albeit slower than a desktop PC. The major problem with laptops is hard drive storage space. Does it have to be a laptop?
Laptops vs. desktops Ta for that. Yep, a laptop is preferred, mostly for aesthetic reasons as we have a small but nice flat and a big hulking screen/tower/workstation set-up would look stupid. Yep, that is the wife's reason. I just wondered if, for the things we wanted it to do (see above msg), would a relatively cheap laptop do the job.
RE: Laptops vs. desktops The answer is yes, but you may need additional storage spacethrough an external drive eventually. Aesthetic reasons? Mmmmm... Tell your Mrs....you can't upgrade a laptop...if one item fails you're snookered. So it could cost you eventually.