Last weeks removal of posts.

I recieved three phone calls and was emailed last week within twenty muinutes regarding 3 threads on the BBS. As I was at glastonbury I removed them without reading them. Seems the chris corke one caused a bit of outrage by one or two folk. With hindsight I probably should have checked the content of it but I assumed it was the usual witch hunt/mischief making against someone who doesn't post on here.

 

With hindsight

would you agree that as you was away and other site admin were around then you should have left it upto them to monitor the site if you couldnt do it properly? (no offence, you yourself admit that you couldnt read posts) If anyone had problems with posts then surely the correct way to deal with it is for them to press the alert button and report it to all of site admin rather than to go running to you and phone you up

 

No idea sorry.

There will be a pm going to city tyke shortly though

 

I agree but also feel that there was a good reason for it being brought up last week. His name appeared as part of a news article so it was only natural that he would get mentioned and then it is only natural that people comment on what he did.

Pretty much in the same way as if it was reported in the sun that gary glitter had just brought out a new album, people would naturally discuss it and slate him for what he had done previously.

 

For "mischief making" and "witch hunt" read outrage .....

</p>

....by those who haven't been daft enough to fall for the Jackanory version of events.</p>

</p>

 

There's a lot of moralising going on

And it's beginning to **** me off. "The motivations for which only they know" and other such pontificating ballacks. It was my post that was deleted. I suggested that he should give his winnings from the centenary society to a charity that deals with sexually abused children. My motivation for making such a comment was that I think it would be the right thing to do. I also don't believe that hiding away from the fact that a previous incarnation of this BBS was administered by someone who was convicted for downloading indecent images of children is a healthy and adult response to the subject. And I'm far happier with my stance on this subject than I am with someone who is part of a group that doesn't think the man did anything wrong.

 

Not really.

It's a thread on a football bulletin board we delete not your lives.

Until someone wants to put forward a 10 or 20 grand legal fund for the next time we get solicitors letters through the post then I'll delete what ever I think might cause problems whether I've read it or not.

 

Do you really want that question answered on here? nt

 

Thats all well and good Jay

But what really do you think is the best way to overcome Fanny Farts during intercourse ?

 

RE: Thats all well and good Jay

Revert to the back doors, problem solved.

 

My partner and I don't have a problem with it

I'm guessing my nob isn't big enough to displace the sufficient quantity of air.

 

I do.

Or you can PM me if you like.

 

Either that

Or she doesn't have a cavernous fanny like my wife

 

I don't think you have any worries in that direction.

</p>

AndI guess you remember the&quot;Right to reply&quot; post. </p>