(blaze) (blaze) (raiseaglass) (bustin) (england) (england) (england) (england) (england) (england) (england) (england) (england) (england) (england)
Glock didn't change his tyres when everyone else did. Thankfully it pissed it down for the last 60 seconds of that race and he had no grip n slick tyres.
Load of B*ll*cks, i don't really care if Hamilton lost this, but if this happened for Massa to win the Championship. You lot and ITV would have been fuming, saying it was fixed, there probably would have wanted an investigation, we would not have herd the last of it. I don't know the name of the other driver. But, i think he fixed it for Hamilton to get 5th place.
Never tracks back can't tackle, one-footed and never wins a 50-50 ball. Typical of Davey's signings and if we persist with him then we'll be in League One next season and blah blah blah blah blah Davey out etc...
I would assume he's basing it on glok practically stopping while hamilton passed. It would be interesting to see what his pace was relative to the other cars after he let hamilton passed, if that showed him still going slow it would show the doubters that he was just having difficulty in the rain. </p> Also which team was it that the commentary team said was in negotiations to have a mclaren engine for next season? Was that toyota?</p> Edit: Actually I think it was force india that they said are likely to be made by mclaren next year not toyota</p>
He finished 5 seconds behind Hamilton after just 2 more corners Also had the same lap time as Kubica for that last lap - he was also on the wrong tyres Also how exactly was he to be given instruction - the FIA monitor all radio communication so he couldnt have been following team orders He was only there in the first place because he gambled on staying on slics - if Toyota had been trying to pull a fast one they would have called him in for tyres as well By the way had Lewis finished 6th - would you have been happy that leaving aside all the other dodgy decisions that favoured Massa over hamilton the one that finally made the difference was the penalty to Bourdais for not letting Massa just drive past him when he came out of the pits ahead of him a few races ago
No. Force India. Was when Lewis was behind Giancarlo Fisichella. And Glock finished 6 seconds behind Hamilton, which shows he was struggling as Hamilton overtook him on the last corner
I didn't say that I thought there was anything dodgy in the result, I was just pointing out why chris would probably assume so. I think him finishing 5 seconds behind in so little time shows that he was just struggling in the rain so I don't think Massa will have any complaints. For what its worth I thought that purely on how the drivers have performed all year then Massa deserved the victory but F1 isn't just about the drivers is it and the McLaren team was far more reliable (for hamilton anyway) which combined with the driver meant the championship was deserved. Did the stewards ever give any explanation about the bourdais incident?
Cheers lee, I thought it was force india when I thought about it. I always get them and toyota mixed up when looking at them. Maybe thats just me though lol
RE: He finished 5 seconds behind Hamilton after just 2 more corners Spot on. Absolutely no way he let Hamilton pass him, like others have said, he was just on the wrong tyres and was having problems in the rain.</p> This conspiracy stuff is all B*ll*cks</p>
Another point if he did let him pass him deliberatly then is that really any different to kimi letting massa pass him the other week to take the win?
