your quote - "The facts are that by not allowing the transfer of Vaz Te, we were denying a very poorly paid player the opportunity to earn a quarter of a million pounds before the Olympics." £800 per week poorly paid then? How much do you earn, you must be on 5k a week then
'A poorly paid player' - in comparison to what some players have been paid this season by BFC, that's factually correct. Don't earn anywhere near £5k a week, but I get to drink beer for free .......
If you had the kind of record that he had, you would be lucky to get such a wage from an employer - fact. the fact you drink beer for free may reflect in some of you judgements, i take it the beer has been flowing free today!
I'm going to drift out of the whole Vaz Te argument as I'm sure I'm boring a lot of people, but £800 a week to £17k a week is too good an offer for a player not to force through the move. £500k for a player who couldn't get in the team on New Years Day, and had played well in 12 games over four years, not as bad a business as people are making out. 'Buy West Ham paid 2 million for Maynard' - 49 goals at Championship level, and Brizzle paid 2.25 million themselves
We owed vaz te nothing, so what if he could earn higher wages else where, he signed for the season i would have made him stay for the season
