Mcnulty

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by klingklang, Mar 3, 2013.

  1. kli

    klingklang Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2009
    Messages:
    259
    Likes Received:
    133
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I believe the problem is that to accommodate the loss of golbourne we have shuffled too many players. This is instead of sticking to the winning team and fitting a player at left wing back even if he is slightly out of position. I know a lot of people think mcnulty is simply not good enough but if playing him there means we can keep that settled three of foster, cranie and Kennedy it might be worth it. He has played left back and midfield so may play there as well (or in argument, badly) as he does anywhere else. Just a thought
     
  2. wak

    wakeyred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    10,007
    Likes Received:
    8,789
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    the clues in my imaginative online moniker
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Agree 100% should slot him in at left wing back without a doubt.
     
  3. Whi

    Whitey Guest

    He hasn't got the engine to get up and down the wing. Plus, he's injured, apparently.
     
  4. Indie Red

    Indie Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,826
    Likes Received:
    1,609
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Tarn!
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Plus he's kinda **** too!
     

Share This Page