Sorry, don't have it to hand - read it down the gym. Basically said it was full steam ahead with the legal case against Sheff Utd; apparently footage of Hume repeatedly asking D'Urso for protection against that lovely person Morgan's elbow will be a big part of the case. Sale attacked the FA's spineless handling of the case and referrred to Morgan's actions as an "assault". He's certainly not sitting on the fence!!
Can you remember mate? </p> Did it say Hume v Morgan, BFC v Sheff Utd or any other combination of those?</p>
This one? <p style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-weight: normal">Barnsley are now committed to pursuing a damages claim against Sheffield United over Chris Morgan’s challenge on Iain Hume, even if it means going to the Court of Appeal.</span></p><p style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-weight: normal">Hume’s skull was fractured in the incident and his professional career could be over. Barnsley, who have hired football lawyer Maurice Watkins, blame Soho Square high-flyer Jonathan Hall for the FA’s astonishing decision not to bring charges against Morgan. </span></p><p style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-weight: normal">The Barnsley case will include evidence of Hume complaining to the referee about Morgan’s use of his elbow even before the fateful assault.</span></p><p style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-weight: normal">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1177276/Charles-Sale-FA-pitch-better-Welch-deal.html</span></p>
