Morgan Hume.

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Brush, Nov 19, 2008.

  1. Brush

    Brush Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,731
    Likes Received:
    16,947
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Ex-IT professional
    Location:
    Swadlincote, South Derbyshire
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    has anyone considered that if the FA decide to ban him for say 8 matches, he will have served his ban and will be back in the team to play us at Bumhole Lane in February. Meanwhile all of our competitors will have the luxury of playing the Blunts without him - possibly gaining more points as a result - and our players will almost certainly face a pumped-up and possibly out for revenge Morgan kicking lumps out of them.

    Where is the justice in that?
     
    Brush, Nov 19, 2008
    #1
  2. Gue

    Guest Guest

    wel I for one o not want him banned for any amount of games at all.

    I want him banned for LIFE
     
    Guest, Nov 19, 2008
    #2
  3. War

    War Tyke New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    448
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    It has crossed my mind. What's in it for us? In reality a ban for Morgan will be 3 games max, maybe 8 at a stretch.

    How is all the fuss going to help BFC?
     
    War Tyke, Nov 19, 2008
    #3
  4. *Windy

    *Windy Banned Idiot

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Messages:
    8,416
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    </p>

    FA action against Morgan will considerably strengthen the case for civil action BFC v Sheffield United and/or Hume v Morgan.</p>
     
    *Windy, Nov 19, 2008
    #4
  5. Gue

    Guest Guest

    A stretch would be appropriate.
     
    Guest, Nov 19, 2008
    #5
  6. Durkar Red

    Durkar Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    12,341
    Likes Received:
    8,457
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Exorcist
    Location:
    err..durkar
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    .
     
    Durkar Red, Nov 19, 2008
    #6
  7. SFOTyke

    SFOTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2005
    Messages:
    5,672
    Likes Received:
    7,160
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired (Early)
    Location:
    San Francisco, California, USA
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    But it's all gone quiet on that front - No announcement re. legal meeting on Monday nt
     
    SFOTyke, Nov 19, 2008
    #7
  8. pon

    pontyender Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    10,799
    Likes Received:
    3,922
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The only thing they may ban him for is the first elbow that the ref missed - which would be a 3 match ban. It was already leaked that they didn't consider the second elbow exceptional enough to act.
     
    pontyender, Nov 19, 2008
    #8
  9. kanecat

    kanecat Banned Idiot

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    Messages:
    5,928
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    RE: But it's all gone quiet on that front - No announcement re. legal meeting on Monday nt

    Yes, i was wondering about that. We haven't heard anything. I think that road would be more of a punishment if we could hit the club and player financially. I don't have much faith in the FA, hope that i am proved wrong
     
    kanecat, Nov 19, 2008
    #9

Share This Page