my take on the steele thing

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Redstone, Mar 18, 2008.

  1. Redstone

    Redstone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    16,238
    Likes Received:
    11,669
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    its seems from what i have read from both clubs the problem seems to be that wba want us to agree to take him at the end of the season. Davey Must not want to be commited to this, and if that is the case i can see where the club are coming from, we should not be forced into signing a player just because we feel he has earned a place for the semi final
     
    Redstone, Mar 18, 2008
    #1
  2. Daz

    DazTyke New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tasmania
    Home Page:
    Steele is no way as good as Muller imho. So why does Davey want a keeper on at least £4k a week when Muller is definitely first choice. SD never puts a sub goalie on the bench anyway. It is a gamble to put Letheren in oals for the rest of the season but he did well against Blackpool.
     
    DazTyke, Mar 18, 2008
    #2

Share This Page