4-3-3 formation Colgan Austin Kay Carbon Heckingbottom Hassell McPhail Howard Devaney Nardiello Hayes SUBS: Flinders Reid Williams Shuker Conlon
mine Colgan</p> Hassell - Reid - Kay - Austin</p> McParland - Howard - Mcphail - Hayes</p> Wright - Nardiello</p> Subs: Flinders, Hecky, Devaney, Shuker, Richards</p> <ul>[*]Our wingers arent doing the job so give McParland a chance, we can always pull him off (oo-er) if he isnt up to it.[*]Hayes sets up a lot but cant score so drop him back onto the left wing where he has done previously. [*]Richards just cant direct a shot towards that 192sq ft that he's paid to....[*]Heckinbottom just isnt quite as good as austin for me.[/list]
Im no Devaney fan but yesterday he did a lot more than usual. He put in some good corners , he should have had a pen after breaking into the box and some of his link play with Hayes was good. Admittedly i would like to see him skin full backs more but really he needs to be on the right side of the pitch to do that. He did however win a few corners which almost got us some goals. Shame about poor finishing from our strikers No doubt you saw another Devaney though!
we wouldnt win nothing in the air tho. n i would drop devaney. id play nardiello n richards or nardi n wright
How far have you got with this "Sponsored Alityke cuddle" ?? I think the pair of us can get a lot out of it . The downside is that we probably won't raise any cash and Alison may grumble a bit !!!
well I asked the missus if she would sponsor me didnt seem too keen for some reason - cant think why not - all in a good cause and all that.
RE: mine Colgan</p> Austin - Hassell - Kay - Hecky</p> Shuker - Mcphail - Howard</p> Hayes</p> Wright - Nardiello</p> Subs - Flinders, Reid , Devaney , Mcparland , Richards</p>
I asked Crystal too She said that she likes Alison a great deal so she doesn't want to see her suffering and values their friendship too highly for it to be risked by the venture . Personally , I think Alison gets ALL the benefits !!!(wicked)We'd simply be doing it for the money ...... ff (wicked) (dribble)
I think he may go for Colgan ; Austin ; Hassell ; Reid ; Heckingbottom ; Shuker ; Kay ; McPhail ; Howard ; Nardiello ; Richards . Substitutes :- Flinders ; Carbon ; Devaney ; Hayes ; Wright . I don't think he'll drop both Hayes and Richards and I think he'll go for a more solid back four and midfield , thus sacrificing either Shuker or Devaney .
RE: mine Colgan</p> Austin Reid Kay Heckingbottom</p> Shuker McParland McPhail Howard</p> Hayes Nardiello </p> </p>
Just to add a modicum of sense Colgan - fantastic this season Austin - probably the most improved player in the side Hassell Reid Heckinbottom Shuker McPhail Howard Holden Ritchie Whoever is todays matchday legend - hopefully John Hendrie (but I think he'll be the Bradford matchday legend) Subs Flinders Williams Kay Geoff Horsfield - (disguised to look like Richards) Toby Tyke - to get a head on the high ball punts upfield
hopefully he'l see see Devaney is no use nor ornament dropped from the team? id say find the highest point at Oakwell and drop him off that instead - might wake him up. Hes been found out and he knows it. 1 killer game v Bradford and that was up against a youngster.
My team Colgan Austin, Reid, Kay, Hecky Shuker, Mcphail, Howard, Nix Hayes, Nardiello Subs Flinders Carbon Devany Richards Conlon Offers planty of attacking options from the bench should things need changing And Conlon can offer differnt challenge to defenders, especially if we have a lead with 10-15 mins to go, as he chases down, knocks players about, and defends set-pieces well. As for Nix, I just think we need to try something differnt. He could be the unknown quantity, ala that postman who played away at Ipswich. If he has a stinker, get Devany on. I'd also like to see Nads get at least 75mins. He may tire after that as he hasn't played 90 mins for some time
