and before I begin I do not know the answer so here goes. What would happen if we did not have a keeper fit enough to play and had to go out for a loanee but, that he , was himself cup tied?
Kozluk was the Blunts outfield keeper, as Warnock never had a keeper on the bench. Apparently he's pretty decent.
but because he is not a natural keeper would the f.a. or f.l. demand an outfield player to take up that position? Thanks for the response by the way
yes, I imagine that we would have to use an outfield player as if a club knew they had no keepers available and so got in a loan keeper for that game but was stupid enough to get one who is cuptied then it is their own fault as they have made the decision to sign a cuptied keeper instead of one of the hundred or so keepers that aren't cuptied.
Firstly it wasn't Kozluk It was Jagielka as SuperTyke says... Secondly, if they're cup-tied they're cup-tied... we need to get one that isn't!