Oh and while we are at it, their keeper should have been sent off

at what stage of the game was that Matey

before or after their goals?

 

that could have changed the whole game

we may even have scraped a draw.

 

If its the one I`m thinking off at their end near corner of the box, his feet were outside but the ball wasn`t.

 

Re: that could have changed the whole game

It looked to me like he controlled it outside box and then handled it inside box. We were questioning whether that counted as a back pass?

 

The ball was in the area. Ref called it right.

 

Inside box when he handled it

 

It was a mile inside the box. Fark me.

 

What about the player who took Winnall out in the first half.Before you say it was a shoulder charge in my view Winnall was just in front of the defender and he barged him over.A red card all day long in my humble opinion.

 

That one was a red definitely. Keeper wasnt from my view

 

Shoulder to shoulder. Ref got that un right too IMO.

 

A shoulder charge becomes a foul if excessive or reckless force is used. This includes instances where a players momentum makes the shoulder charge excessive or reckless. IMO whether it was shoulder to shoulder or not it was clearly excessiveand reckless today.

 

Agree to disagree then. No foul. We'd have gone mad if that was given against us.

 

What I dont understand is if that wasnt a foul then why was the weaker shoulder charge 5 minutes later a yellow card?

 

You'd have to ask the ref that. No consistency.

 

The ball was in the area, he didn't do anything wrong.

 

Lino was on other side of pitch, but he was inside (just).

Also, he kicked the ball out of his hands from outside the box second half a couple of times. Should have been blown for those, although we were losing at the time, so wouldn't have made a diff

 

I said exactly the same at the time. For me the first shouldve been at least a yellow. But to not even give a free kick?!