Can we have another option please? Not being lied to by the board? 'There is money for players' etc etc
We CANNOT make permanent signings until January. Have patience.</p> If McIndoes fee brings in the quality centre half we are crying out for will you be happy?</p> If McCann & Reid are more than adequate replacements?</p> If Walwark shores up our leaky defence?</p> If Knight proves more prolific than Tommy Wrong et al?</p>
RE: We CANNOT make permanent signings until January. What about if he doesnt go in the end and we all live hapilly ever after.....until the next manager gets the bootff
Reid err...isn't he "highly regarded" at West Ham - i.e. they aren't going to let him go permanently.
Once an agreement to buy has been made then you cannot go back on it Remember Horsfield and the Blunts?
Maybe Maybe we extend the loan if hes good enough, send him back if not.</p> Maybe AR's strategy would be best - he may be no better than what we have, lets not bother.</p>
or maybe "He may be no better than what we have, no point getting rid of McIndoe in order to bring him in"
RE: Only one signed with a view to a permanent move, the other 3 on loan till Jan 1 I reckon Knight is a loan with a view to permanent transfer because he's fallen out with Jackett.
Maybe the McIndoe situation has only cropped up since AR's departure?</p> No, that would dispel too many conpiracy theories wouldn't it? Can't be true then.</p>
TheMcIndoe thing has been bubbling up for at least a day or two because his replacement arrived first thing this morning. And whatever else it was at least duplicitous of the club to hold the news back until nearly 7 o clock.