set of old ****ers, so if you deliberately kick someone our FA deems a 3 match ban far too harsh and pushing to get it reduced, yet if you spit on someone they deem it worth at least a 3 match ban? not condoning either act, both dirty ****s, but come on, whats worse kicking or spitting?
spitting is worse for me I've played hundreds of football games in my life and have probably been kicked at least once in all of them. Lots of times unintentionally, occasionally intentionally. But unless it's a vicious, malicious attack then you just get up and get on with it. Being spat at is just ******* disgusting. Thankfully I've never had to endure it. But I've every sympathy with those who go mental when they've been spat on.
Re: spitting is worse for me i understand where your coming from, but you ain't gonna get injured been spat at! my point is how can the FA sympathize one and chastise the other which both certainly carry 3ish game bans by todays standards
"but you aint gonna get Injured being spat at" so you are not familiar with hepatitis and H.I.V then, and god knows whatever else body fluids can carry and transmit.
Re: "but you aint gonna get Injured being spat at" could be sarcastic and say those are not injuries, odds on that happening are very slim, more chance of catching it due to the few 1000 gobs spat out onto the grass during play and getting it been tackled! both rooney and alcaraz are both dirty *******s and both need punishing to the full, not the FA groveling so capello can justify rooney going to the euros
