People I hate....Part 1

<u>Undertakers.</u></p>

I don't mean the people who bury you when you've carked it but the tw*ts who think its quicker to undertake on the motorway then nip in causing everybody in the fast lane to slam on the anchors.</p>

Complete and utter ******* of the highest order.</p>

 

Racist. nt

 

Cheers *Windy

Niceto hear from you again after your sabatical.</p>

Nice star btw.</p>

 

RE: Cheers *Windy

An old man stood by the waterside</p>

On his beast he carried an obelisk</p>

He did not attempt to brave the tide</p>

As he had too precious an ............</p>

 

Is the star code ?

Does it denote 'special needs'
or does it suggest some kind of status ?

 

I always think the star on computer text looks like a bumhole.

Or Gabrielle's dodgy eye.

 

Dodgy Eye I reckon

Gabrielles bumhole is much more of a @

 

If I had a star for each special need....

...t'would rival the firmament.</p>

I had &quot;Windy&quot; shut down soI wasn't recieving messages and now i can't fire it up again. I can change it if it offends you.</p>

 

I'm easy *Windy

But give it a week, or more maybe, and some will cotton on to the fact that you're actually "Windy"

 

People I hate....Part 1(a)

<u>Middle lane dawdlers</u></p>

I have undertaken on motorways many a time when I encounter the lowest form of driver that is the middle lane dawdler. If you're wanting to travel along the M1 doing 65mph then fine, but get the f**k into the left hand lane to do it. You shouldn't be in the middle lane unless you are overtaking something in the left (which these prize pillocks will never do) or if you're movign over to allow traffic from a slip road to enter. </p>

When these mindless brain transplant donors sit there blissfully unaware of the world around them then frankly they deserve running off the road. </p>

It's not always possible to move out into the right to get past these fools as there is already a stream of traffic in that lane. In cases like that these prats are nothing more than a moving obstruction and I think undertaking is entirely justified. Works fine in the US too, thoroughly enjoyed driving there.</p>

 

Heartily seconded. nt

 

I'm with nutkins on this one

undertakers are cnuts. If there is a Middle Lane Dawdler then the safest action, assuming that the outside lane is busy,
is to get as close as you can (maybe 3 or 4 feet) and flash your headlights at them. Mouth 'move over you wnaker' too if
you like

 

What about those.....

<div>.... who insist on sitting in the middle lane at 51mph, never advancing on the vehicle that is about 1/4 mile ahead, and forcing the entire advancing army of vehicles into the third lane eh?</div><div>Is it ok to undertake those, or shall we just reduce the motorways to one lane and save concrete.</div>

 

Oh no I agree...

But when there isn't a middle laned dawdler within 150 miles of the lovely person who undertakes then its infuriating and dangerous to boot.</p>

Always seems to be 40 somethings in company Vectras or bottom class BMW's, mainly white ones.</p>

God I'm a car racist.</p>

 

Those who don't let bikers passed, forcing us to squeeze down the middle or to undertake. Barstewards.

 

Sadly ...

These people are too stupid to realise. Even after they've been undertaken by several cars they still sit there in the middle lane not getting the idea. I'd seriously pull them over and give them an instant ban, on the spot, get walking home you knob ...

 

Yup ...

The unnecessary undertakers are usually the pompus gets too full of their own sense of self-importance to believe that the rules of the road apply to them ...

But I still hate middle lane dawdlers more...

 

Like I said I agree with the middle lane thingy...

However my job involves driving 1000's of miles a month and I tend to drive of the safer side of speed but spend a lot of time in the fast lane only to be undertaken by a clown at 100 miles an hour until he reaches are car in the middle lane then he flicks the indicator on and aims for a gap about the size of a rizla paper thus making me slam on the anchors.</p>

And breathe.</p>

 

Bikers who drive like tw@ts. Sick of the cnuts driving up our road at 70-80mph or twice the speed limit.

That advert on telly where the guy pulls out into the path of an oncoming biker, says something like when did you see the biker. Last f@cking second cos the **** was doing 120 in a 30 zone.

Despise undertakers more though.

 

People I hate....Part 1b

Bikers who sit behind you (close enough to hold on and hitch a ride) in a queue of 20 cars on a winding country lanes, and then nip out overtake (often on a blind bit of road) only to nip back in so close to your front wing you have to break. It's even worse if they are hiding on the bumper of the car behind and they overtake two cars (pulling in an inch in front of you) because you can't see them until they scream past, scare the **** out of you causing you to swerve and avoid almost hitting them as they pull infront of you into a space that doesn't exsist at the same time as breaking.

One day one of these silly f@ckers will kill themselves on the front of my car, and I'll be really pissed off ... that I've been involved in their death.

I always adjust my position for bikers as soon as I see them, especially in a sationary queue of traffic or a wide road where they can nip down the middle, even if there is oncoming traffic. I can't say I'm perfect, but I try my best and as long as they aren't weaving or going too fast between stationary cars, I can see them and give them a wide berth.

I almost wittnessed a biker do a head on vs. impail himself on the car bonnet of the car he was overtaking just yesterday. Fortunately he pulled it off, but he must have left himself with brown pants and certainly almost caused the driver in front to swerve off the road. I'd realised he was a ********* when he overtook me so dropped back about 10-15 metres and didn't have to break too hard, but I thought I was about to witness my first raod death.