Peterborough

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Dyson, Apr 3, 2012.

  1. Dys

    Dyson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    14,430
    Likes Received:
    4,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tarn centre
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Just been reading their Chairman's tweets and it's really interesting.

    They've got a policy of only offering 3/4 year deals.
    If a player refuses a contract when they have 12 months left they go on the transfer list.
    Says there's plenty of money in the transfer kitty for the Summer and they could be the big spenders.

    Now I know the situation's different in that he's pumping cash in and Cryne's stepping back but the principles of the clubs are the same - smaller club in the league, low attendances and signing young players from down the leagues but they seem willing to take risks on their players with contracts. We won't.

    Plus they'll probably get about £5 million in the Summer for Taylor and Boyd.

    More and more of our problems point to how it's run off the pitch, not on it.
     
  2. Con

    Conan Troutman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    17,469
    Likes Received:
    2,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Professional Football Fan
    Location:
    Tarn
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I think all of our probems stem from how it's run off the pitch.

    Offering long term contracts is a good idea if someone is willing to sign it but I wonder if it might put a lot of modern day mercenaries off. Difficult one.
     
  3. Redstar

    Redstar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    26,953
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Fidel's Bedside
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Fully agree. But no one dare so owt abart Cryne.

    Read JD's section on the time pre admin. Just that.
     
  4. Dys

    Dyson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    14,430
    Likes Received:
    4,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tarn centre
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Read it mate. Which bit you referring to?
     
  5. Redstar

    Redstar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    26,953
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Fidel's Bedside
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
  6. Gor

    Gordon Ottershaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    4,335
    Likes Received:
    2,916
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Old Town
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Maybe he's referring to the offer that Cryne made for the club, whereby he didn't want any of his money to be put in just to line the shareholder's pockets, but instead wanted his money to go towards paying the club's debts and improving the playing side. As that seems to be the deal that the former board rejected on the shareholder's behalf (without putting it to any shareholders other than themselves - funnily enough the majority shareholders and the people who were going to miss out on the biggest windfall), I fail to see what any non-shareholder could possibly find wrong with that.

    Unless there's something in the book that I missed?
     
  7. DEETEE

    DEETEE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    10,230
    Likes Received:
    2,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Would that be from the same meeting where Dennis was asked if ISOFT had made an offer and he said no...
     
  8. Redstar

    Redstar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    26,953
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Fidel's Bedside
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    There was a better deal on the table that did not come off. We're not talking millions to pay the shareholders and I dare say the ones who were planning to stay would not have had a payout?

    The former board members lost money from admin because they boought up shares to prevent a takepver, it is referred to in the book too.
     
  9. DEETEE

    DEETEE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    10,230
    Likes Received:
    2,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    In short it was a cluster**** of egos and money grabbing
     
  10. Redstar

    Redstar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    26,953
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Fidel's Bedside
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Think that is unfair.
     
  11. DEETEE

    DEETEE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    10,230
    Likes Received:
    2,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Not really. Admin should never have happened.
     
  12. Redstar

    Redstar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    26,953
    Likes Received:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Fidel's Bedside
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Agree. Tell the NatWest that.
     

Share This Page