Question for deetee (football finance/ Transfer type stuff)

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Hemsworth Tyke, May 25, 2012.

  1. Hem

    Hemsworth Tyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    15,755
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Listening to radio (ithink it was) and they where talking about Liverpool finances.

    I think they said they had got all the money for the Torres transfer on their books but had only had part of the transfers for carroll on it which meant the books looked better tan they could have?

    Did i get that right do you think and how can they do that?
     
  2. Con

    Conan Troutman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    17,469
    Likes Received:
    2,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Professional Football Fan
    Location:
    Tarn
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Because transfers can be paid in full or installments so someone pays you in full before you pay someone else. Or vice versa.
     
  3. Hem

    Hemsworth Tyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    15,755
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    That simple then.

    Thats what i thought but surely the Torres deal will have been paid in a similar way or does that go straight on to the books even though its over x amount of time.
     
  4. Con

    Conan Troutman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    17,469
    Likes Received:
    2,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Professional Football Fan
    Location:
    Tarn
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I suppose it would depend on Chelsea and if the wanted to pay it in full asap. As for when it would show on the books, I'm not sure - BFC Dave would be the best person to answer that. I suppose it's bit like someone giving you a cheque but it wouldn't show in your account until it has cleared.
     
  5. T-Dog

    T-Dog Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2011
    Messages:
    547
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I'm not an expert on football accounting but I would expect the full amount of the transfer fee to be recognised at the point of sale (even if paid in instalments) based on standard accounting principles. The only situation I could see this being deferred into another financial period is if there was some contingent element to the fee such as fees per appearances or per goals or per england caps which shouldn't be recognised until 'earned'.
    Hth
     
  6. DEETEE

    DEETEE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    10,230
    Likes Received:
    2,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    T dog has explained it almost to a T. Yes losing £49m is slightly better than losing about £90m.


    They really should ignore Liverpool as they have the assets to cover the debts on the playing staff. They should look at boltons. That's an eye opener.
     
  7. Hem

    Hemsworth Tyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    15,755
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Read somewhere that Botlon are trying to half the there wage budget.

    I think they said there budget was 25 million.
     
  8. DEETEE

    DEETEE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    10,230
    Likes Received:
    2,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    They owe £100+ million. A large chunk of that is to the owner at 5% interest.

    The club wanted more funding before relegation as they already had a shortfall in turnover. Can't wait till about January if they struggle mid table.
     

Share This Page