random question here,but: do you think there should be a "sacking window"???

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Jimmy Red, Nov 22, 2006.

  1. Jim

    Jimmy Red New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,160
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Darfield
    Home Page:
    it might sound a little daft, but i think it could be a good idea.</p>

    teams could only sack/change their managers post season, and during the transfer window.</p>

    alot of teams would have to stick with their managers, and they would get the chance to turn things around etc . . .</p>

    like i said, a bit random, but i think it could work.</p>
     
  2. Gue

    Guest Guest

    what about times of gross misconduct (im not for a second saying thats what happened here by the way - just an example)

    if a manager was caught with teh hands in teh till

    or, had been found downloading dodgy stuff on works computer

    or had beaten the crap out of someone in teh team

    the list goes on and on....

    you'd need to get rid ASAP?

    otehrsiw, ti wouldnt be a sacking, it'd simply be a 'putting the manager on the transfer market'
     
  3. Jim

    Jimmy Red New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,160
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Darfield
    Home Page:
    very true actually.</p>

    so, maybe fire the manager for stuff like that, but if its only the results that are not so good, then keep them on until the &quot;sacking window&quot;</p>

    although i do like the sound of a transfer list for managers - that could be quite good actually. </p>
     

Share This Page