re MOTM v Preston

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by paul.d, Jan 15, 2007.

  1. pau

    paul.d Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    12,917
    Likes Received:
    769
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    it wasn't Atkinson-if it was we would have drawn-totally at fault for their goal
     
  2. S.M.

    S.M. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    9,624
    Likes Received:
    553
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Correct

    let Chilvers out jump him almost unchallenged. admittedly its all a learning curve, but Im not sure we're in a position to be brushing that kind of thing off. Interested to know the reasoning behind leaving Kay on the bench.

    having said all that, our strikers were/are awful, and its up front where we should be looking to change things completely. Hayes and Nardiello arent going to score the goals to get us out of trouble, as much as I thought they deserved a chance, they've not done it.
     
  3. pau

    paul.d Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    12,917
    Likes Received:
    769
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I hope

    that it was because he was carrying a slight strain-if he was fully fit he should definitely have played-my choice would have been to leave Reid on the bench
     
  4. La Dent de Crolles

    La Dent de Crolles Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,515
    Likes Received:
    323
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Photomask Engineer
    Location:
    Pasir Ris, Singapore
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I was wondering why Reid was in and Kay was out.

    Reid's aimless punting of the ball up the field didnt help either.
     

Share This Page