Serious question about England

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Journo Tyke, Jul 2, 2006.

  1. Journo Tyke

    Journo Tyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    14,139
    Likes Received:
    1,217
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Mortgage and Protection Advisor
    Location:
    People's republic of Yorkshire
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    If I or any one else on this board had 'managed' England in the World Cup, would we have done any worse than under Eriksson? The answer should of course be yes as he gets paid £4million a year, but I suspect the answer is actually no. Obviously, we'd need the coaching staff the same as he had, but do you get my point? What exactly has Eriksson done to earn his money?
     
    Journo Tyke, Jul 2, 2006
    #1
  2. Red

    Red Fern New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    3,872
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Melton
    Mcclaren(sp) did all the work as you saw.</p>

    we were lacking up front and its cost us...not to mention the penas....shocking..will we ever learn,,,,[​IMG]</p>
     
    Red Fern, Jul 2, 2006
    #2
  3. O.W.T.

    O.W.T. New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,046
    Likes Received:
    0
    We could all have done better.....

    we would have picked a more balanced squad for a start
     
    O.W.T., Jul 2, 2006
    #3
  4. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RE: We could all have done better.....

    The thing that i wonder is, how much influence did Mclaren have in the squad,team and formation? If i was there i would have done things a lot differently.
     
    Guest, Jul 2, 2006
    #4
  5. dartonpete

    dartonpete Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    955
    Likes Received:
    542
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Darton
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Shagged Ulrika!:D
     
    dartonpete, Jul 2, 2006
    #5

Share This Page