Burton was tripped. It was his theatrics that got him sent off. Ha ha! Couldn't have happened to a more deserving bloke. The ball definitely crossed the line for our goal. Their goalie attempted to smother it and sneak it underneath him. Hartford deserved to go. He'd ignored the third official for ages. They came to cheat and spoil the game and that incompetent ref allowed them to do it for too long. By the time he started punishing them it was too late for us. Oh and it looks like Knob might be in a spot of bother again, the Rotherham fans are reporting him to the FA for his report. What a pro.
"The Rotherham fans are reporting him" - WTF! It's a report on a club website, of course it's going to be biased, if I go on another clubs site and read a report then I expect not to agree with it, I've read reports of our games far worse than that but you just let it go. "Boo Hoo, the naughty Barnsley man is saying bad things about us"! They'll be reporting that guy who does those Huddersfield reports next. So he said one of their players cheated - the ref concured seeing as he booked him for a dive, whether they thought it was or not, the ref saw it that way and therefore booked him for cheating. Diving is cheating, he got booked for it, so just what is wrong with the report saying the player cheated? Murdoch constantly held the arm of the forwards, one of our players got booked for complaining to the ref about it and the next time he did it the ref booked him - he then proceeded to do it for the remainder of the game.
Doesn't matter how you dress it up, our official web site, the voice of our club, should not be calling one of the opposition players a 'cheating Miller'. The language is too inflamatory. Yes, you expect the report to be biased, the report writer has an affiliation with our club, but you don't expect our club to be calling players of another club names, whether he dived or not. If that's his personal opinion that's fine and he should use this BBS express it, he's on here often enough, but don't do it in the official match report. Credit where it's due like, I thought the rest of the report was far more balanced than the Rotherham one.
got to agree read the report its quite fair. its just the language used is only going to get him into trouble. "the cheating miller" is strong stuff and not worthy of a official club report.
What is he then - a cheating tyke, a cheating blade, a cheating owl, a cheating rotherham player?</p> Time to get a grip. Histrionics gone mad again. </p>
nice to know that this board makes a difference. how many times do things get changed or removed from official site after being mentioned on here?
you would think he could type it into something that checks spelling and grammer. Or a know this is a wild, radical idea proof read it.
RE: Unfortunately.......... good point. Im sure someone else could read it first and point as you did and many would have noticed the poor quality of the report.
RE: Unfortunately.......... rOB does'nt neEd hi5 wIrk chekcing/ H'es teH bestist reportr ni hTe wurlD>