Which paper was that then? Sheffield Star?? Dint do too well on the BBC and Sky ratings</p> http://www.skysports.com/football/user_ratings/0,19768,11065_3108922,00.html</p> http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/h/hull_city/live_text/6276013.stm</p> and look who was near Halmosi when he scored and only got 6 with the Mirror http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/2009/02/27/fa-cup-sheffield-united-boss-blasts-officials-after-controversial-hull-victory-115875-21156265/</p> I watched the game and can tell you he deserved no more than a 6, so where you got MOTM from must need their eyes testing </p> </p> </p>
No it was one of the Dailys I didnt watch it so I cant say if he was ***** or not, but it seems strange that Barnsley fans are saying he was **** , but a Daily newspaper made him MOM. I dont know how he could have been both?
RE: No it was one of the Dailys 1 of the daily's - the Sun - http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/article2276653.ece</p> But then the mirror says he was only a 6 </p> Mate of mine is a Blunt, and even said that he did not know exactly what he was on the pitch for </p>
I watched the game and he was anonymous and unlike most people on this board I'd have him back tomorrow. The game went over his head and Hendrie had far more of an influence in the game. Also and I hate to say this but errrr he 'who's name must not be mentioned' played well.....no not Voldemort the M man