Shuker-one of our few players with genuine pace has now gone.

RE: Shuker-one of our few players with the ability to hit the first man with a cross has now gone.

 

little legs moving quick doesn't make someone fast.

 

.A winger who scores 10 goals in the first half of the season.

 

Thanks again for that.

Its a shame he didnt turn up for the 2nd half though isnt it.

 

I know hes not liked on this site neither was Paul Hayes

But Hayes shoved the criticism right down your mouths,big style.

 

RE: Just like Shuker did

So he had better offers but decided to sign for Tranmere because he's only good enough for them?

 

RE: Thanks again for that.

Yes it is,no argument he didnt do very well after Christmas but i think Shuker was brilliant for us, to be nearly top scorer from a wide position is a great achievement in my opinion especially after a below par second half of the season,yeah we know he couldnt cross very well,nobodys perfect,when the commentators talked about us they said we had two out and out wingers who were real threats.Good luck Shukes.

 

RE: Thanks again for that.

Shuker was an objectionable little gob-***** who was arrogant enough to cut his nose of to spite his face and walk out to a smaller club. At the end of the day he had a poor second half of the season because he stopped working hard. When he first arrived he worked his arse off and I thought he was great, but then he started squabbling in the back room. I haven't got any time for over paid arrogant footballers who don't earn their money. When I saw him sat in a porche boxster I thought 'is that what you get for playing in the old third division?'. It's all nonsense.

The players have got to want to be with us. If they don't, let them them leave. At least we know that the players who have stayed have wanted to be Barnsley players.

 

The jury is out on all of our players in the Championship?

I mean could you imagine players like Wright, Nardiello and Richards getting on top of defences with the likes of Chris Perry and Gary Kelly because i cant,Paul Hayes has a chance with his quick feet and decent movement but up front we are going to struggle,all this rubbish about they got us up so their going to be given a chance,why throw points away in the first 10 games and then decide oh look our forward line isnt good enough,some areas of the team do look good enough but that forward line needs changing.

 

Super Shukes is almost universally loved on this site.

I have always been a fan of Hayes.</p>

I like to go against the grain.</p>

 

No point in having pace if u cant cross or take players on

thats why hes playing league 1 football next season

to be fair hes small aswell

 

To be fair

you're talking ***** again.

Shuker is not a big loss, Hayes would be.

 

RE: No point in having pace if u cant cross or take players on

No,the reason hes playing league 1 is because hes getting 500 extra pounds every week.

 

RE: No point in having pace if u cant cross or take players on

Yea right !

 

What are we supposed to have offered?

Is there not a salary cap in leagues 1 and 2 now?

 

I think we offered same as last season?

He clearly did not get a better offer hence his last ditch attempt to stay at oakwell.</p>

So long and thanks for all the umpa lumpa fun, the ten goals and the Cardiff penalty.</p>

 

RE: No point in having pace if u cant cross or take players on

Chris Westwood knows the truth.

 

Do you think we will replace him with someone who scores more than 10?

I doubt it very much.