Sort this swear filter art will tha Gally? Otherwise am gonna abuse yer facebook wall wi every obscenity I can find and include a selection of otherwise underused offensive terms in each of my posts on here, starting with felching and frot. They'll also be mainly homosexual terms to add even greater offence. I can't even say p I 55, t I t s etc. I don't mind f c k I n g being blanked out and the usual like c u n t and w a n k e r but p I 55?! Kin ell fire.
Re: Site Admin - for f u c k sake. probably not suitable for ******* bairns. what a strange thread indeed
Re: Site Admin - for f u c k sake. probably not suitable for ******* bairns. This swear filter even objects to Jo.ey. That's going a bit far when you consider we have a poster called the same.
Re: Site Admin - for f u c k sake. probably not suitable for ******* bairns. lovely people is allowed though. Bizarre.
Re: Site Admin - for f u c k sake. probably not suitable for ******* bairns. Ok ok ffs. Have tweaked it a bit.
TEST - not suitable for kids or boring stuck up 'why do you have to swear' fowk **** piss **** **** **** sucker mother ****er tits tart turd **** ****er ******* piss JOEY COME ON! AT LEAST LET US HAVE SH IT!
Re: TEST - not suitable for kids or boring stuck up 'why do you have to swear' fowk Ive been on PNE and Donny's boards this last week, and there is no filter whatsoever. But folk arent swearing left and right. So I dont see why ours cant be the same. Id like to see it removed for a week, and see how adult we all are.... :/
Re: TEST - not suitable for kids or boring stuck up 'why do you have to swear' fowk Why aren`t you at work?/been booed at again!!!!
Re: TEST - not suitable for kids or boring stuck up 'why do you have to swear' fowk We were getting complaints when we first moved to this format as there was no profanity filter for quite a while but I have to agree we went too far. We're never going to please everyone unfortunately!
Re: TEST - not suitable for kids or boring stuck up 'why do you have to swear' fowk Im not fussed either way tbh, but I did find the PNE site quite refreshing. The format is exactly the same. I forgot I was on Preston's board when me, Nightmare and Dreamy were discussing Doyle t'other day! But Paul, I think the excessive swearing at the start was more down to it being the 'start'. Folk got a bit silly with it. I think a filters a bit pointless anyway. You only have to type **** or lovely person to get round it. Id give it a week without the filter like I said. And if it gets silly mate, at least you tried.
Re: TEST - not suitable for kids or boring stuck up 'why do you have to swear' fowk It`s time the swear filter went for good because its turning me into a reight foul-mouthed b@st@rd by me protesting to being censored. Removal would see less abusive language and anyone going OTT could just get a 24 hour ban to bring them to their senses.
On the flip side You just need to be creative with what you say. Agree the swear filter needs to be a bit more lenient, but we hardly have to ban anybody these days or monitor for abuse because it just isn't there. Much better than accusations of us being Nazis