Smoking in public - serious comparison

Stale secondary smoke is a by product of smoking tobacco.</p>

Urine is a by-product of drinking liquids.</p>

If people who drank were legally allowed to piss all over your clothes and your hair - I'm sure there would have to be a very welcome change in the law.</p>

It's exactly the same - bring it on.</p>

 

smoke rises upwards in the outdoors.
piss goes where you aim

 

yeah but not many have contracted cancer from secondary piss.

 

Strange thing is, both my parents smoked like chimneys, my sister does, my nan did and most of my mates smoke yet ive not got secondary cancer, just smell smokey after a night out.

 

which is very unplesent anyway, so id ban it just for that. goes upwards outdoors and there by polluting the enviroment. People who smoke tend to hold the cig away from themselves and straight into some one else so they avoid the smoke and inflict the horrible smell onto others.
and you may yet get cancer so dont think your over that one yet

 

if anyone wants to smoke fair enough, but i dont so why should i have to put up with the stink of smoke on my clothes? the freedom of choice should be on the side of people who dont want to smell of smoke

 

I can get cancer from areosols, maggot dyes,salmon exhaust fumes mobile phones ,the list is endless.

 

you can choose not to go near any of them but we cant choose if some one lights up next to us

 

Smokers - just shoot the fookers!

Next...

 

The freedom should be by both parties. Otherwise your discriminating.

 

The right to smoke carries with it the responsibility of not inflicting your death sentence on others.

 

Smoke permeates

...aimimg doesn't come into it.</p>

 

no because by not smoking we dont interupt with a smokers life, but by smoking they inflict on us something we dont want.