Bobby hassell played but played better at Leeds (apparently saying This is an anti Hassell) We should have won Dawson played well
Saying 'Bobby hassell played better at Leeds' is not anti-Hassell. No one is claiming it is. But so far you've said: "giving sloppy passes in mid field and ****ing about with the ball in our box when he should have row z" "First half poor distribution Hassellesqe second half some reckless risks in our box" "Too wasteful and too many silly risks" "Gave the ball away with poor passes a couple of times and also took some mcnnulty type risks" And pretty much all that is anti-hassell. So stop being maungy, stop claiming you're being got at and if you want people to believe you do rate Hassell then praise him and stop pointing out his every mistake.
Actually you said it was a real shame Hassell couldn't maintain the high standards he set himself at Leeds - as if the last 10 years never happened. I didn't see the Leeds game, but he played great yesterday too, even if not as great. Still great. You were just after a reaction and you got one. Isn't that a result?
The Leeds & Bolton performances were very similar. Impeccable MOTM first half, totally bossed the game, tired in the second half and got subbed. The tiring is down to lack of match fitness, due to match time given under the last two chumps.
Bearing in mind he hasn't featured under the two mangers before & most of us have questioned their logic. Their logic has been WRONG.
I think Keith hill said he would not play full back, I think Danny Wilson appears to hold the same opion he is a quality deep midfieldet
I said it's a real shame he couldn't reach the high standard that He set himself against Leeds but he played well 6/10 as opposed to 9,9/10 at Leeds