So Steele is rubbish again then !!!

People on here have ****ing short memories and are blinded by the fact that Hill has signed another keeper so therefore they have to say Alnwick is better than the best keeper in this division. These are the same people that were saying last season Steele should be playing for England !!! FFS !!

Alnwick is OK, no more and sometimes a bit less. But Hill signed him so he is fantastic.

Another thing, when we signed Cranie he was supposed to be a fantastic centre half, according to most of the posts on here anyway! He is shocking at Centre Hal;f!!!, doing a good job in midfield but in his " proper position" he was crap.

Never mind though, it matters not, it will be someone elses fault after xmas !!

 

I don't think anyone's said that. From the posts I've seen the key theme is that Steele is an excellent keeper. But bar one mistake against Ipswich Alnwick has played very well and looks a good signing. A good position to be in

 

Steele will be rubbish when he leaves

I think that's how the rules work!
However, as far as Cranie is concerned, unless I'm mistaken he's only played one game at centre half for us. So it begs the question, do we decide a player is shocking after one game? Knee jerk reactions agogo!

 

Who said that Steele was crap?