So then.......DNA

Can be 'partial', there's doubt about its integrity after a certain length of time, it doesn't tell you HOW it got in a certain location, can be pretty much interpreted how you want.</p>

Well, I for one can't wait for a full DNA database of us all to eliminate crime in the UK.</p>

 

It could go a few ways.

If they have a blood spot attached to a fibre similar to that of the car boot then they're in business, although where they reckon Madeleine was kept up to the car being hired we'll have to wait and see. If they have a dried blood fragment with a location they say they retrieved it from we can draw our own conclusions. Fibres etc are unlikely to be reliably dated unless there's some other element involved. I guess they'll expect to be fully believed and that they've put a damning case together but if theyhave offered this two year deal (I think it's too bizarre to have been made up) then it's looking very much like they have next to nothing.</p>

Of course this would all mean that two middle-class British b4stardsare in the right at the expense of some foreigners which would make us fascists and therefore must be ballocks.</p>

 

RE: It could go a few ways.

head of their CID equivalent was on this morning saying that the latest DNA sample found in the car was not as conclusive as had been first reported.</p>

Bit late for that........still, job done eh ? The salivating press and public desperate for a bit of 'I told you so' have what they want.</p>

</p>

 

so.....

do we know if the blood was in the interior of the boot or attached to fibres etc like ya mentioned? Christ, she could have had a nosebleed etc months before and there could be traces on clothes etc. I mean, why do pubes appear everywhere?

 

Oh Windy FFS

"Of course this would all mean that two middle-class British b4stards are in the right at the expense of some foreigners which would make us fascists and therefore must be ballocks."

That statement is, frankly, B*ll*cks.

I've got no idea one way or the other if they (the McCanns) had anything to do with the dissaperance of Madeleine, but we shoudl not assume that the Portugeuse Police have been incompetent just because the British press say so.

The fact is that kids go missing all the time and its usually very difficult to find them, at home or abroad.

What I do know is that had her parents been more reponsible, then she would likely has not never have gone missing and that is the only thing I can level at the McCanns at this stage.

The fact that had it been working class parents from Kendray that had left their three children in a locked/unlocked apatment while they got pissed that they would have been villified by the press is completley seperate to the fact that a poor innocent lass is missing either at the hands of some sicko or her parents.

I think that the possibility that Gerry or Kate could have something to do with it after all we have seen them do is what makes it so hard to accept.

 

Quite easliy

The fact is, we do not know and can only speculate.

 

mmmmm

certainly does look like they are struggling. In any investigation like this they look at the parents 1st but to suddenly revisit them 100 days on smacks of panic/lack of ideas. I mean, they probably sat down and thought "hey we're struggling, let's check the hire car they used 70 days after the kid went missing cos we've nowt else to go on"

 

RE: mmmmm

I thought that the hire car was used 25 dats after she went missing?

 

dunno mate - so many conflicting reports nt

 

That's true enough... nt

 

Sorry mate.........

.......but this board is riddled with that attitude. Ketilbert, Eastender and Acky to name but three are nailed on to take that stance in any situation where they can side with anyone against the British or the West in general but never have anything to say the other way. It's impossible not to polarise against such one-sidedness and consequently any attempt at balancing things up is met with hysterical accusations of xenophobia. </p>

I'm not saying for a moment that the McCanns were right to leave their children unsupervised. I'm just saying that I don't think they had a hand in Maddie's disappearance and there's far too muchanti-Brit, class-prejudicedposturing on this board. Maybe a single mum from Kendray would havegoneunsupported but two wrongs don't make a right.</p>

There are those amongst us who happily pat themselves on the back at every opportunity for their right-on credentials but who, in actual fact, arethe most prejudiced and closed minded of all.</p>

 

RE: Sorry mate.........

Ketilbert, Eastender and Acky to name but three are nailed on to take that stance in any situation where they can side with anyone against the British or the West in general but never have anything to say the other way.


Unbelievable - you should read what's said a little better....I have never taken an anti-British/Western stance purely to do so and if you had read my comments about Iraq, for example, I think you would realise that....I've had more than my share of disagreements with Acky for example.

 

RE: mmmmm

Youare presuming that this is the only evidence they might have.

 

You do it a lot mate.

Your news posts and new threads almost always go just the one way but I admit you're not as bad as the others and you don't seem irretrievably locked into position. I think we're polarising without realising it sometimes.</p>

With regards to arguing with Acky, anyone who lives in the real world and isprepared not to be bored into submission by bizarre tangents and sheer volume, can't fail to disagree with him at some point.</p>

</p>

 

RE: You do it a lot mate.

You make severalstatements based on fact, guesswork, supposition and rumour - i point out that you were right that the Portuguese police were slow in doing somethings properly, but that if they were to claim the McCann's were guilty that there also wouldprobably beother evidence. </p>

You then lamely go on to say that this is about me being anti-British when it isn't, it's about not rushing to conclusions.</p>

I do not know whether they are guilty or not and neither do you. You're sat thousands of miles away yet you seem to know that the police are going to try them from murder - when you don't know and can't know.</p>

</p>

 

See? nt

 

RE: See? nt

I see only your tangent that my view and others in because we're anti-British. LOL</p>

If you're going to troll, at least make a good fist of it and work out a good argument.</p>

</p>

1/10. Must try harder.</p>

</p>

(RIP) </p>

 

Can you calm down and repeat that in English?

Or do you struggle with the language of evil?

 

What have I said?

I don't think I've even posted on a McCann thread to this day! The reason being is that I, like you, am not fully furnished of the facts and, therefore, not in a position to categorically state their innocence or guilt.

For the record, I was very surprised when they were announced as suspects and would be even more surprised had they been charged or confessed.

You need to take that Sigmund Freud cap back to the shop you bought it from, mate - you're clearly reaching, yet again...

 

Eh? Do you want to read my post again?

You clearly haven't calmed down yet. &quot;**** from **** knobsack wnaker grrr.&quot; Heh heh.</p>