People Who Want Rid Of Ritchie If The New Manager (If We Got One) Lost His 1st Nine Games, Would You Want Him Out?
RE: And if ritchie stays If Richie is allowed to buy players and then loses his next 9 yes get shut but don't sack him for failing with a squad which is arguably weaker than the one which barely got us promoted.
RE: AR must shoulder at least 50% responsibility for that. nt Dunno the full story, Richie said he wanted to give the lads a chance which was fair enough. It's become clear that the squad isn't good enough but how much has been made available to spend? Not nearly enough I would imagine.
Allegedly, money was available for strengthening from last summer But Ritchie chose to go with what he had and give the players who got us up a chance to prove themselves in the Championship.
We can all imagine what we want AR has consistantly given out diametrically oposing statements regarding signings.</p> He started the season saying he wanted to give the existing squad a chance.</p> He has not mentioned the word "experience" until the last week when panic stations has set in depsite the fact that it was bloody obvious from June it is what we sadly lacked.</p> He has not once mentioned that his hands are tied.</p> This is old ground.</p> I am bemused as to how some on here are clinging onto the idea that he is not at the very least partially (if not fully) culpable for our <u>current</u> position.</p>
RE: We can all imagine what we want I thought we went for Lucketi at the start of the season? Didn't get him, not enough money on the table.
Dunno whats to say someone did not think that Lucketti wanted too much money in comparison to "the lads"? </p> Not saying thats the case or otherwise but who knows??</p>
RE: Dunno Mmm Hard to know who's to blame but a couple of decent experienced players will keep us up and I don't think Richie's done a bad job. Judge him at the end of the season. Win the next 2 homes and things will look alot different.