but why is Scotland been offered a new contract and not Harewood. If i had my way it would be the other way around. Scotland can't play for longer than 30 minutes. Marlons still a beat and will scare any defence still.
We don't know if Harewood is yet. But I would still choose Scotland, he is a threat coming off the bench. His touch and awareness are still top class. Marlon has been great for us mind.
is marlon on holiday? personally I would take Scotland over Marlon, but they've both been great this season
Jason Scotland: Six goals in eighteen league appearances. Marlon Harewood: Two goals in thirty-two league appearances. I agree with what you're saying about Scotland not being able to play many minutes, but he scores goals given an opportunity. Harewood had a good spell upfront with Dagnall, but before Davies left he was mainly poor (besides the Forest game). He could still stay, but I doubt he'll get offered a contract.
Whether he can only play 30 mins, without Scotland's goals we'd have been relegated with over a month of the season left!
Because Marlon hasnt got a clue where the net is, and thats what hes paid to do at the end of the day. I just dont think hes good enough at this level.