http://www.examiner.co.uk/huddersfi...asted-as-town-sunk-by-penalty-86081-20520361/ http://www.bufc.co.uk/MatchReport?fixtureId=1118988 (He loves giving penalties, doesn't he?) http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/football/Barnsley-boss-Davey-slams-referee.5193587.jp Martin Dexter: Linesman http://www.pinkun.com/cs/forums/1649416/ShowPost.aspx (Hmmm...) http://www.bufc.co.uk/MatchReport?fixtureId=2161721 (5 months ago, he was running the line at the likes of Boston United...) In conclusion: What a pair of *****.
Would love to see a photo of this apparent red mark on kozluks chest because the video shows the ball hit his arm not his chest
What ever happened to the ruling that if the hand or arm stuck the ball it is a foul, but if the ball struck the hand or arm it is seen to be accidental, and no foul is given
This is the problem - inconsistency of approach. To be fair, if IF the ball did hit Kozluk on the arm then imho it was a penalty as he had his arms up - intentionally or not, and stopped the ball going towards goal. Another ref (or linesman) another game and it won't be given. Probably Reading at Norwich....
RE: Would love to see a photo of this apparent red mark on kozluks chest I reckon it skimmed his chest/ribs on its way through to hitting his arm. Koz may well have been unaware it hit his arm because of the sensation on his chest/ribs.
RE: Would love to see a photo of this apparent red mark on kozluks chest Ball to hand then innit? Also as the lino "thought" it wor a pen he hardly made a deceisive decision. </p> Robbed. Robbed I tell thi! :'( </p>