over paid injury pron and living on his repitation richard kell looks five time the player then mcphail is he must go now
kell needs to eat his weetabix on a morning. Didnt even look to have the strength to pass the ball. Hopefully he will improve a lot.
and you've based that on a 10 minute debut? I can see how you've come to that decision, seriously I can (worship)
Just Arse I'm with Bob Geldof on the Monday thing. How does this site work again? fillet? word association. Am I right?
you tell me when was the last time he played well or played more the 4 games with out two weeks out injured
Kell has started 94 games in over 5 years two broken legs. I suspect he now wont be half the player you think he is.
The last time he played well was the last time he played. And as for the 2nd part of your blurb. Eh ?
Apparantly so is Jarman But the step up from reserves to first team is huge, not just in quality but the physical side too. I hope kell turns out to be a decent player, but just on size alone he didn't seem to be the answer to our midfield problems. We lack a bit of bite and tenacity (think thats the right word)
So, let's get this right: McPhail is too injury prone, but Richard "Gridelet" Kell is quality?</p> Aye, alright.</p>