Colgan</p> Austin Hassell Kay Heckingbottom</p> Shuker McPhail Devaney</p> Hayes</p> Richards Wright</p> subs </p> Flinders Reid McParland Nix Williams</p>
not with only 5 subs and I wouldn't go in without a goalie-he just hasn't performed this season-and I know people will say he's not had a chance but you have to take it when it comes
How about ? Colgan ; Austin ; Hassell ; Kay ; Heckingbottom ; Shuker ; Reid ; McPhail ; Devaney ; Hayes ; Richards . Substitutes :- Flinders ; Carbon ; McParland ; Nardiello ; Wright .
RE: not with only 5 subs would't pick williams, u've got austin who can move to left back, hassell you who can move if need be
In a 4-1-3-2 formation</p> Colgan</p> Austin Hassell Kay Heckingbottom</p> Horlock</p> McParland <strike>Reid</strike> McPhail Devaney</p> Richards Hayes </p> subs </p> Flinders <strike>Carbon</strike> Reid Nix Williams Nardiello </p> (amended as it has been pointed out we should sign horlock and I agree....) </p>
Hard to predict as someone might get injured tonight, but I think either Wroe or Tonge will come in to replace <strike>burns </strike>Howard.
how can they both be justified to keep a place... shuker has been toilet for weeks if not months. wright, could be a fair point, but IMHO would rather hayes and richards. they look the most settled strikeforce so far this year. (as they are the only ones who get to get a regular partnership BTW)