...................Steele................. ...Hassell...Foster....Moore...NLB... ...Hammill..Colace..Butterfield..Hallfredson... ...............Hume....Bogdanovic...............
RE: Why Butterfield over Anderson? nt Anderson,very skilful, but like i said earlier, My Nans faster than him.
Cant see JCR being dropped Steele Hassell Moore Foster Potter JCR Iceman Butterfield Hammill Boggy Macken
Personally i think Anderson has been very poor since January And today, Butterfield was much better than him, even though he didn't have a blinder himself. I'd give iceman a goal in the middle, or even Colace if fit because i think him and Butterfield will play well together.
RE: Why Butterfield over Anderson? nt You cant seriously think Butterfield is a better option than Anderson in midfield. Butterfield has lots of potential and is very good on the ball. Without the ball he can not tackle and his positional play is awful. All will improve with experience, but you can not think we've a better chance with him in the side and Anderson not.
RE: because quite clearly we have no one else But we quite clearly dont have anything better on the pitch.
RE: because quite clearly we have no one else so your solution is exactly? play a half fit hume for an hour and risk further injury... mmmmm
RE: because quite clearly we have no one else And yours is keep playing him for 25 minutes which isn't going to get him fit for 90? And when does pushing yourself mean you'll get injured?