Straight 4-4-2. You can see why. It looks balanced to be fair. Assuming Mellis is injured Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Assuming Crainie at right back? No Mellis? I'm quite ok if we move him on this window, much prefer Cywka.
Full backs worry me. Kennedy struggles in a 4-4-2. I don't like 4-4-2 anyway. Hope to be proven wrong. Some quality on that bench, mind.
I know Blackpool were awful, but TK didn't struggle against them. Even forced 'Monaco bound' Ince to switch wings in the second half. Blind optimism that this is the start of his recovery from being our worst player ........
I'm hoping to see some kind of improvement in Kennedy, hopefully Wilson as been working his magic on him
We had five in midfield. He's always better with five in defence/midfield. In a 4-4-2 he struggles. Hope Brek can help him out, as many on here suggest a winger should do.
Why people are happy to get rid of Mellis is beyond me. More people were against Perkins going!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I know o'brien has been good for the past month or so. But I am abit scared to see him and Dawson on the middle. Would rather see digby in there with o'brien. Because both Dawson and o'brien can't really pass the ball
We're going for graft in central midfield, and flair/pace out wide. I think. I trust Danny. Still worrying, though...