Thats the nearest I have come to a willard incident

How can an official be so biased and get away with it.</p>

That ref, who is not named in the programme because he was so poor at Oakwell earlier in the season we would have been up in arms, should be struck off.Was it M Oliver?</p>

The man is not fit to officiate and his contract should be terminated with immediate  effect.</p>

absolutely feckin shocking. </p>

 

Dont blame the ref!!!

 

he was shocking though.

 

He was biased

Booked our players and let theirs go.</p>

One of the uddersfield players ran half the length of the pitch to foul our player and because he hurt himself he got away with it.</p>

nads got booked for having a shot....wtf</p>

missed two penna shouts.</p>

The man is an absolute joke, only a fool can not see it.</p>

He is the worst ref I have seen in 30 years of watching/playing football.</p>

He should be struck off with immediate effect, the man is incompetent.</p>

who was it btw. was it M. Oliver?</p>

 

No Red Fern Nads got booked for

deliberatly kicking the ball away after the whistle was blown, it was his own stupid fault, he then wasted 3 mins of our precious time arguing, then gets himself sent off for another stupid incident, the hudders lot must have been pissing themselves at such an immature show, is there any wonder hes not selected more often,
yes the ref had a shocking game and appeared biased but also dont forget Howard should have been sent off for 2 bookings but he booked the wrong player

 

Nads got booked for

been in a red shirt.</p>

Bookings: Nathan Clarke (Huddersfield) Heckingbottom ,Howard ,Nardiello ,Richards (Barnsley) </p>

the ref was one way.</p>

 

take off those dark glasses, your as biased as the ref

 

RE: take off those dark glasses, your as biased as the ref

Charming.</p>

How can you defend such awful officiating.</p>

 

I,m not defending the majority of the descisions

but no one could argue that Nads didnt get himself sent off, the ref was perfectly correct re that one, in fact if id been a hudders fan i would probably been miffed he wasnt given 2 yellows for the first incident coz he spent nearly 3 mins arguing with the ref, also coz the ref was so bad Howard wasnt sent off in the first half, he had already been booked, commited a foul (not really a booking offence compared with some of their tackles i admit) but the ref proceeded to book the wrong player ie not howard, so you could argue that he kept us in the game, yes, i also think we should have had a penalty

 

M Fletcher (if thats who it was)

41 games , 146 yellows...  7 reds.  </p>

says it all really, the Howard incident just adds weight to my claim.........Incompetent</p>

 

RE: Nads got booked for

So you are defending Nardiello

Sorry - but bookings for kicking the ball away and then dissent and just plain and simple stupid bookings that a player should easily avoid getting....Ritchie will no doubt be furious about them.

And if you see a ref is being petty then even more reason to avoid picking up stupid bookings....theres simply no excuse for it.

 

No, not defending Nardiello

For his antics, but I'm sure a stern talking to would have been more appropriate.</p>

One of their player deserved to walk after an attrosious tackle on one of our guys in front of the bench,in which he hurt himself(but jogged off after)  but the ref was never going to book him because he had just been booked.</p>

The ref was unfit to officiate...........for both sides. </p>

did you go?what did you think of the ref?</p>

 

RE: He was biased

Not to mention the challenge on Colgan in the first half

 

Agree

Definitely biased but pure stupidity by Nardiello.</p>

Not a bad as the ref at Brentford though.</p>

 

That was Nathan Clarke

He had already been booked at that stage.

 

How the hell Clarke stayed on I've no idea

As blatant a yellow card offence as you'll ever see.