Every one I've seen I wouldn't have int bloody house, particularly the 37+ screens.</p> Pixilation and fuzziness, particularly around moving figures like footballers, or horses racing. High definition stuff like DVDs don't look bad, but a lot of ordinary television broadcasts still look like they've some way to go.</p> Are we in a transition stage at the mo, waiting for better spec broadcasts or what?</p>
Not necessarily I have a Bravia with an "upscaled" DVD player- HDMI interface. Much better than a standard connection to a CRT TV. The DVD technology is the same- its how its sent up to the TV. HD-DVD and Blu Ray will turn out to be the biggest waste of time ever unless they cost the same as a normal DVD- there really won't be a lot of difference to what we have now. Its all about the telly and the connection.</p>
If you have a decent receiver (ideally HD) and a good LCD telly, there won't be any of the problems you've mentioned. The connection is also critical (HDMI cables can be anything from £4.99 to £200!- the more expensive the better the quality of the image).</p> You'll only get the issues you've mentioned if either the source, TV and/or connection is poor.</p>
That's probably the key! He's probably seen them in Dixons etc....who can't even set a widescreen TV up properly never mind anything else!
No, I've seen one in somebody's house Tshhhhhhhhhh.</p> Wasn't impressed. Bit gaudy. People on it looked like they'd been superimposed onto the background. Reminded me of a digital photograph when you've blown it up just a bit too big and it's starting to lose definition.</p>
Cables make very little difference They're sending a digital signal comprising 1 and 0. Audi cabling can make a huge difference but for HDMI I have yet to find someone who's recommended buying a more expensive cable than equipment tends to be provided with. Sky HD arrives Friday
Whatever you do.... Don't use the HDMI cable that comes with your SKY HD box. Its w&nk.</p> Get one of these: http://tinyurl.com/yj6lkl</p>