surely there should have been some response from either Davey or Shepherd along the lines of-he's not going anywhere-he's just signed a 2 year contract</p> poor PR IMHO to put it on our site </p> unless there's something in it and they are preparing us for the worst?(N) </p>
Agreed The annual report said something along the lines of "this club won't be commenting on deals until they are done" .................... yet the Official Site seems to fly in the face of that logic. Whats the use in having a club protocol if it isn't consistent throughout the organisation ?
RE: Agreed ah but wasn't that just on acquisitions ? This is ona sale so therefore need time to soften us up !! Remember how 'well' the Mc Indoe sale went down !!!
heaven help us all if............... they use this board's posting to gauge "true reds" opinion
RE: Agreed They're not commenting, they're rounding-up what has been reported elsewhere. Since when did I agree with the club on its communications policy?
Absolutely pathetic. One minute they say we dont comment on transfer speculation and the next they are putting a story like that on the official website. Its almost like they are saying, come and get him, he wont cost that much!!!!!!! No wonder were a laughing stock.
and they just had a baby as well! not that it's got anything to do with this post, but thought u would like to know!
This has got nothing to do with 'owt Davey or Shepherd said. The club always puts the rumours surrounding the club on the site.
but by approving the posting on the site without any comment just looks ridiculous-unless Rib has carte blanche to post what he likes??
Why Would......... we say as early as last week that we will no comment on transfer activity unless it's done and dusted and then go and put this rumour up? Is it done and dusted that he is leaving? Rib I see had a nice dig at the article with the title and starting story.