Three nil down and take a striker off

If that isn't a clear message sent to the board then I don't know what is

 

Can't wait for Hemsie's take on it

 

Board .... you mean cryne

 

We have about 300 midfielders and he starts 442 unbelievable

 

To be fair I'd have gone 4-5-1 today, as unless Bradshaw improves hugely it's effectively 4-4-1 with him.

 

I could probably write it now.

 

"What on earth was Heckingbottom thinking? He should obviously have packed the midfield. Then took a striker off at 3-0 down.

He's so useless we should sack him and appoint someone good like Iain Dowie"

 

Should have played 4231. That would have made players able to defend

 

Why does PH stick with the outdated 4-4-2? What we need is a more modern tactic, yes I know that LJ played the same formation today, but lets listen to what GN says and he says that we need a 3-4-3 flexi system! Chelsea have got some fantastic young players on their books that are used to this system, we should be knocking on their door begging to loan 10 !

it will be something like that from the west yorkshire Guru !!

 

So it looks like he started with the following 4-4-2...
Davies,
McCarthy, Jackson, MacDonald (cap), Yiadom,
Potts, Moncur, Williams, Mowatt,
Ugbo, Bradshaw,
Subs: Hammill (Bradshaw), Hedges (Potts), Payne (Ugbo).

If he brought Hammill on for Bradshaw, how did that effect the team and did we go 4-5-1 for the second half ?
It must have been a straight swap up front between Ugbo & Payne, but questions have got to be asked now about Bradshaw and our failure to bring in the sort of strikers we desperately need.