thought he looked quite efective as the 1 in front of the back 4</p> if we are going to play 4-1-4-1 then we can't afford to isolate the lone striker as we did last night-the midfield need to support more</p> it will take time to work it out and I'm not sure we have that time</p> Wright looked more effective in the role than Richards</p> McIndoe was probably MoM but defensively not a patch on Shuker-but that's not why he's in the team-can see him scoring a few</p> Letheren-scary!! need an experienced back up</p> Colgan-a bit flat footed for 2 of the goals</p> McParland-looked OK</p> Williams-one excellent run and shot</p> Hassell-run ragged by their left winger</p>
RE: What did you think of Healy? OK- not as effective as Togwell at breaking things up-slightly more adventurous in outlook--maybe worth a pay as you play contract-due to worries over fitness
Course he would I think we should sign Lampard on one of those deals too. £100 a game. He'd jump at chance.
RE: Course he would If no-one else comes in for Healy then I reckon he would. What choice does he have?
Fruit and Veg stall in the East End? A walk on part in Silent Witness?</p> If you had a family, which i presume he does, could you afford to sign a contract that only pays you when you play?</p> I know I couldn't unless I had a large amount of savings which I doubt he will have taking into account he's been around the block these last few years.</p>
RE: Do you really think so Depends really on the who that someone else is. If his fitness is so questionable that we're unwilling to offer him more than a pay-as-you-play then he's unlikely to find anyone in our division willing to gamble on a longer contract. So that may leave him with the choice of trying to earn a contract with us, or signing somthing longer with a League 1 / 2 side. Is anyone else looking at him, out of interest?
I honestly think that anyone who expects him to sign a pay as you play contract is living in dreamland. It just doesn't work like that.
RE: Would he sign... It would have to be a deal where he gets paid a wage regardless of playing as well.</p> £300 a week basic pay + £1k per game he actually plays would be a reasonable offer maybe.</p>
RE: I honestly think wouldn't be surprised to see him on a short term pay as you play till he proves his fitness then sign a long term.
RE: I honestly think Not ideal for the lad, I agree. But as I've said, it depends on what other options are open to him.
that was......... sort of what I meant-obviously no-one would agree to no wages at all unless they played
RE: This is Barnsley playing in the championship Have another lie down Gladys. Are you saying pay as you play deals don't happen at this level?
