Gets taken off. Armstrong strolls around for a bit and starts the next game. I would love to know the logic behind tat lazy tw@t getting so much game time
I think both are poor option for all his work Bradshaw never looks like scoring, rarely holds it upa nd the attack often ends with him. Armstrong lacks work rate and commitment and won't create his own chances. Watkins is probably our best option up front but it's an area we desperately need to strengthen I think Bradshaw will be a good squad player next season
This thread merely repeats what we already know. Turning your blood to water is no replacement for the bulk and talent required to satisfactorily hold the ball up. Bradshaw cannot do this well enough. He does try. And he offers more as a whole to the team than did Winnall, but he's not as deadly. Armstrong has been a big disappointment for me. People talk about Kent being inconsistent. Well...... Armstrong is a mile behind as far as incorporation into the team structure and end product is concerned. We have a potentially (for us) sublime way of playing. If we kept those beyond the front two we'd be safe next season already. We need the final jigsaw pieces upfront, and Hecky signed up for life.
Yes again, what is Hecky thinking of ? Sorry but I cant defend these constant pointless changes he keeps making, week after week.